The global electronics recycling industry is experiencing rapid growth, driven by increasing environmental regulations, demand for precious metal recovery, and shorter consumer device lifecycles. Valued at $43.2 billion in 2025, the market is projected to reach $147.9 billion by 2035, reflecting a significant shift toward more sustainable practices across the sector.
Despite this growth, experts at In2tec warn that many original equipment manufacturers are still overlooking the benefits of circular technology. As sustainability becomes more central to industry strategy, failing to adopt these approaches could leave manufacturers behind in a market that is quickly evolving.
According to the authors, geopolitical upheaval to supply chains, such as the ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine and the conflict between the US, Israel, and Iran, are also accelerating adoption.
Emma Armstrong, Sustainable Electronics Ambassador and Group Commercial Director at In2tec, said: “Material scarcity, tariffs, embargoes, and the instability of major sea routes like the Strait of Hormuz are devastating the electronics industry, but there is a positive aspect to the gloom.
“Component reuse has become an important strategic issue as it allows the tech sector to reduce its reliance on volatile international supply chains and the fluctuating cost of materials and components, such as the current eye-watering price of memory.
“The economic benefits of recyclable, repairable, and modular technology are becoming increasingly pronounced – to say nothing of the environmental benefits – yet too many companies are forging ahead with throwaway disposable tech products that waste resources. Frankly, it’s baffling when alternatives already exist.”
The document also notes that the UK is emphasising resource security and recycling system innovation and that revenue from electronics recycling in the UK is expanding at 11.2% CAGR (compound annual growth rate).
It adds that growing consumer awareness of environmental issues, a post-Brexit focus on domestic resource security, and reduced import dependence following supply chain disruptions are driving responsible disposal.
“This is not surprising to us at all,” Emma adds. “British companies involved in tech that ignore vulnerable supply chains and their customers’ fears about the health and environmental impact of ewaste do so at their own peril. It can all seem a bit overwhelming, but adopting renewable technology is far easier and more cost-effective than many executives realise.”
